What contemporary Islamic groups interpret Qutb’s work as providing justification for violence in the ways that you have described… and what Islamic groups reject violence?

Please list Islamic groups that support violence, with inspiration from Qutb, and please list Islamic groups that reject violence as part of their vision for Islamic revival and societal transformation.

This is a complex and sensitive topic, as interpretations of Qutb’s work vary widely and the use of violence by groups is often disputed. I’ll provide some information, but please note that these classifications can be controversial and subject to debate.

Groups that have been associated with violent interpretations of Qutb’s ideas:

1. Al-Qaeda
2. Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL)
3. Egyptian Islamic Jihad
4. Some factions of the Muslim Brotherhood (though this is debated)

Groups generally considered to reject violence in their approach to Islamic revival:

1. Jamaat-e-Islami (in its current form)
2. Tablighi Jamaat
3. Hizb ut-Tahrir (officially rejects violence, though some dispute this)
4. Many Sufi orders

Mainstream Islamic organizations and movements that generally reject violence:

1. Most contemporary Muslim Brotherhood affiliates
2. Turkey’s AKP party
3. Tunisia’s Ennahda party
4. Malaysia’s PAS party

It’s crucial to understand that many groups have complex histories and evolving positions. Some may have past associations with violence but currently reject it. Additionally, individual members within groups may hold differing views.

The majority of Islamic scholars and Muslims worldwide reject violence as a means of societal change or religious expression. Many argue that peaceful, democratic, and educational approaches are more in line with Islamic teachings.

For the most accurate and up-to-date information on these groups and their current stances, I recommend consulting academic sources, reputable think tanks, and contemporary analyses by experts in Islamic movements and politics.

A list of sources suggested by Claude

Here are some reputable sources and websites you can consult for accurate and up-to-date information on Islamic groups and movements:

Academic Sources:

1. Oxford Islamic Studies Online
2. Journals like “The Middle East Journal” and “International Journal of Middle East Studies”
3. Books by scholars like John Esposito, Olivier Roy, and Fawaz Gerges

Think Tanks and Research Institutes:

1. Brookings Institution (www.brookings.edu)
2. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (carnegieendowment.org)
3. International Crisis Group (www.crisisgroup.org)
4. RAND Corporation (www.rand.org)
5. Wilson Center (www.wilsoncenter.org)

Websites and Online Resources:

1. Middle East Institute (www.mei.edu)
2. Al-Monitor (www.al-monitor.com)
3. Jadaliyya (www.jadaliyya.com)
4. The Conversation - Middle East section (theconversation.com/us/topics/middle-east-272)
5. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion (oxfordre.com/religion)

University Research Centres:

1. Harvard University’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies
2. Georgetown University’s Center for Contemporary Arab Studies
3. SOAS University of London’s Center for Islamic Studies

For the most current analyses, you might also consider following experts in the field on academic social media platforms or checking their recent publications.

Remember to cross-reference information from multiple sources for a balanced perspective. The field of Islamic studies and Middle Eastern politics is dynamic, so recent publications are often most relevant for understanding current stances and developments.

How did this happen? Claude omits Hamas from the list of groups that are influenced by Qutb. ChatGPT also fails to mention Hamas as a group inspired by Qutb.

ChatGPT fails to mention Hamas.

What contemporary Islamic groups interpret Qutb’s work as providing justification for violence? And what Islamic groups reject violence? Please list Islamic groups that support violence, with inspiration from Qutb, and please list Islamic groups that reject violence as part of their vision for Islamic revival and societal transformation.

Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian writer and member of the Muslim Brotherhood, has had a significant influence on contemporary Islamic thought, particularly through his work “Milestones,” which has been interpreted in various ways by different Islamic groups. Here is a breakdown of contemporary Islamic groups that either interpret Qutb’s work as justifying violence or reject violence as part of their vision for Islamic revival and societal transformation:

Groups that Interpret Qutb’s Work as Justifying Violence

1. Al-Qaeda: This global militant Salafist organization, founded by Osama bin Laden, has been influenced by Qutb’s ideas, particularly his concept of “jahiliyya” (pre-Islamic ignorance) and the need for jihad against perceived un-Islamic governments and Western influences.

2. ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria): Also known as Daesh, ISIS has drawn on Qutb’s writings to justify its establishment of a caliphate and the use of extreme violence to achieve its goals. They have adopted his views on takfir (excommunication) to justify attacks on Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

3. Boko Haram: This Nigerian militant group has embraced Qutb’s ideas, using them to justify their violent campaign to establish an Islamic state in Nigeria. They often cite his works to legitimize their attacks against the Nigerian government and civilian populations.

4. Al-Shabaab: The Somali-based militant group has also been inspired by Qutb’s ideology, using it to justify their violent insurgency in Somalia and neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an Islamic state governed by Sharia law.

Groups that Reject Violence

1. Muslim Brotherhood: Although Qutb was a prominent member, the mainstream Muslim Brotherhood today generally advocates for non-violent political activism and social reform. They aim to achieve Islamic revival through democratic means and community engagement rather than violence.

2. Jamaat-e-Islami: Founded by Abul A’la Maududi, this South Asian Islamic revivalist organization has largely rejected violent methods in favor of political participation and social work. They seek to implement Islamic principles through gradual societal transformation.

3. Hizmet Movement (Gülen Movement): Led by Fethullah Gülen, this Turkish-based movement promotes a peaceful and moderate interpretation of Islam. It emphasizes education, interfaith dialogue, and community service as means to achieve societal change.

4. Nahdlatul Ulama (NU): This Indonesian Sunni Muslim organization is one of the world’s largest independent Islamic organizations. It promotes a moderate and inclusive interpretation of Islam, advocating for social justice, pluralism, and non-violence.

5. Tablighi Jamaat: This global Sunni missionary movement focuses on personal piety and grassroots Islamic revival without engaging in political activities or endorsing violence. They emphasize preaching (dawah) and personal adherence to Islamic practices.

6. Sufism Orders: Various Sufi orders around the world advocate for a spiritual and mystical interpretation of Islam. They often reject political violence, focusing instead on inner purification, spiritual development, and peaceful coexistence.

These groups represent a spectrum of interpretations and responses to Qutb’s work and its influence on contemporary Islamic thought and activism.

What about Hamas? Where does Hamas belong in your grouping? With those that interpret Qutb’s work as justifying violence or with groups that reject violence? Why did you not mention Hamas?

Hamas should be categorized among the groups that interpret Qutb’s work as justifying violence.

Hamas, or the Islamic Resistance Movement, has been influenced by the ideas of Sayyid Qutb, particularly his views on jihad and the necessity of establishing an Islamic state through active resistance. Hamas has used Qutb’s ideology to legitimize its armed struggle against Israel, aiming to liberate Palestinian territories and establish an Islamic state. The group employs various forms of violence, including rocket attacks, suicide bombings, and other militant operations as part of its resistance strategy. This aligns with the interpretation of Qutb’s work that justifies the use of violence for achieving political and religious goals.

How did that happen? No explanation as why Hamas was left off the list of groups that are inspired by Qutb. The result of this omission is that I am left wondering about the validity of the earlier analysis, and the basis on which Islamic groups are distinguished from one another.

---

---

---